A green building, also known as a sustainable building, is a structure that is designed, built, renovated, operated, or reused in an ecological and resource-efficient manner.
SuperGreen Buildings Technology
Chuck Steiner | WaterSmart Environmental, Inc.
A green building, also known as a sustainable building, is a structure that is designed, built, renovated, operated, or reused in an ecological and resource-efficient manner. |
|
by C. G. (Chuck) Steiner President and CEO WaterSmart Environmental, Inc. |
Building History Buildings account for over one third (1/3) of global energy use and associated greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. Reducing energy use by buildings is therefore an essential part of any strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and thereby lessen the likelihood of potentially catastrophic climate change. The buildings in which we live, work, and play protect us from Nature's extremes, yet they also affect our health and environment in countless ways. The design, construction, operation, maintenance, and removal of buildings takes enormous amounts of energy, water, and materials, and generates large quantities of waste, air and water pollution, as well as creating stormwater runoff and heat islands. Buildings also develop their own indoor environments, which present an array of health challenges. Where and how they are built affects wildlife habitat and corridors and the hydrologic cycle, while influencing the overall quality of human life.
As the environmental impact of buildings becomes more apparent, a new field called green building is gaining momentum. Green, or sustainable building, is the practice of creating healthier and more resource-efficient models of construction, renovation, operation, maintenance, and demolition. Research and experience increasingly demonstrate that when buildings are designed and operated with their lifecycle impacts in mind, they can provide great environmental, economic, and social benefits. Elements of green building include 1. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 2. Water Stewardship 3. Environmentally Preferable Building Materials and Specifications 4. Waste Reduction 5. Toxics Management 6. Indoor Environment 7. Smart Growth and Sustainable Development What Makes a Building Green?A green building, also known as a sustainable building, is a structure that is designed, built, renovated, operated, or reused in an ecological and resource-efficient manner. Green buildings are designed to meet certain objectives such as protecting occupants health; improving employee productivity; using energy, water, and other resources more efficiently; and reducing the overall impact to the environment. What Are the Economic Benefits of Green Buildings?A green building may cost more up front, but saves through lower operating costs over the life of the building. The green building approach applies a project life cycle cost analysis for determining the appropriate up-front expenditure. This analytical method calculates costs over the useful life of the asset. These and other cost savings can only be fully realized when they are incorporated at the project's conceptual design phase with the assistance of an integrated team of professionals. The integrated systems approach ensures that the building is designed as one system rather than a collection of stand-alone systems. Some benefits, such as improving occupant health, comfort, productivity, reducing pollution and landfill waste are not easily quantified. Consequently, they are not adequately considered in cost analysis. For this reason, consider setting aside a small portion of the building budget to cover differential costs associated with less tangible green building benefits or to cover the cost of researching and analyzing green building options. Even with a tight budget, many green building measures can be incorporated with minimal or zero increased up-front costs and they can yield enormous savings (Environmental Building News, 1999). What Are the Elements of Green Buildings?Below is a sampling of green building practices. Siting
Energy Efficiency Most buildings can reach energy efficiency levels far beyond California Title 24 standards, yet most only strive to meet the standard. It is reasonable to strive for 40 percent less energy than Title 24 standards. The following strategies contribute to this goal.
Materials Efficiency
Occupant Health and SafetyRecent studies reveal that buildings with good overall environmental quality can reduce the rate of respiratory disease, allergy, asthma, sick building symptoms, and enhance worker performance. The potential financial benefits of improving indoor environments exceed costs by a factor of 8 and 14 (Fisk and Rosenfeld, 1998). Choose construction materials and interior finish products with zero or low emissions to improve indoor air quality. Many building materials and cleaning or maintenance products emit toxic gases, such as volatile organic compounds (VOC) and formaldehyde. These gases can have a detrimental impact on occupants' health and productivity. Provide adequate ventilation and a high-efficiency, in-duct filtration system. Heating and cooling systems that ensure adequate ventilation and proper filtration can have a dramatic and positive impact on indoor air quality. Prevent indoor microbial contamination through selection of materials resistant to microbial growth, provide effective drainage from the roof and surrounding landscape, install adequate ventilation in bathrooms, allow proper drainage of air-conditioning coils, and design other building systems to control humidity. Building Operation and MaintenanceGreen building measures cannot achieve their goals unless they work as intended. Building commissioning includes testing and adjusting the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems to ensure that all equipment meets design criteria. It also includes instructing the staff on the operation and maintenance of equipment. Over time, building performance can be assured through measurement, adjustment, and upgrading. Proper maintenance ensures that a building continues to perform as designed and commissioned. Buildings today account for 40 percent of energy consumption in developed countries. The goal of the Lafarge-United Technologies alliance was to achieve energy self sufficiency by the year 2050. By self sufficiency is meant the consumption of net zero energy from external power supplies. Another objective of the building alliance is to produce zero net carbon dioxide emissions. Energy self sufficiency technology has already been achieved in hundreds of buildings throughout the world as distributed natural gas enables buildings to generate their own power supply. The exhaust from power generation equipment, however, always contains carbon dioxide and NOx gases. In the WaterSmart Environmental wastes-to-energy program carbon dioxide and NOx gases are beneficially used to produce microalgae through photosynthesis. The microalgae, in turn, can be converted in biodiesel fuel while the biodiesel refining waste products are converted into methane gas. Earlier this year world famous Lafarge Group and United Technologies formed a worldwide alliance in March to achieve buildings energy self sufficiency by the year 2050. This distant date can be accelerated to the year 2010 since the basic energy self sufficiency technology has already been identified. Please refer to attached WSE Engineering Drawing No. S-1598.
The WaterSmart Environmental technologies are designed to have zero carbon dioxide emissions to fully comply with the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change. The WaterSmart Environmental technologies include the production of both natural gas and biodiesel fuels, both of which can be used for heating buildings, for boiler fuel, for steam production, and to generate electricity. Producing fuels at the building location itself eliminates the necessity to hook up a natural gas supply line. Buildings may therefore be built in remote locations without regard to the availability of natural gas pipelines, electricity power, sewage treatment plants, or landfills making them totally energy and waste management self sufficient. Solid and liquid wastes produced within each building are processed in the same manner as the biodiesel refining waste products. The buildings therefore produce no wastes that require landfill disposal. The identical technology can be used to produce self-powered trains and ships that discharge zero carbon dioxide in full compliance with Kyoto Protocol. The technology also produces potable water that, in turn, makes the building water self sufficient obviating the need for a potable water line connection. With ever increasing energy, fuel, waste disposal, and water costs green buildings that are constructed or converted using this technology should become far easier to finance since operational costs are always an integral consideration of project financing. Buildings so constructed or converted become eligible for renewable energy credits thereby decreasing operating costs even further. The WaterSmart Environmental technology was carefully developed over a 10 years period to totally eliminate all greenhouse gas emissions to the environment. It is the only waste-to-energy technology worldwide to have eliminated all greenhouse gas emissions. The energy created is called Renewable Energy since the electricity is always created from renewable wastes. WaterSmart has developed Kyoto Protocol compliant energy independence wastes-to-renewable energy designs for cities&counties, cars, trucks, jet airplanes, trains, barges, ocean ships, pulp&paper plants, sugarcane mills, and also concentrated animal feeding operations. Its comprehensive worldwide waste-to-energy program was commercialized about six months ago. Early stage waste-to-energy projects now exist in Mexico, Panama, Bolivia, India, and the United States. Its main marketplace objectives are economic development coupled with massive jobs creation. The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement, negotiated in December 1997, by which industrialized nations have committed to making substantial reductions in their emissions of greenhouse gases by 2012. A total of 155 countries have committed to the agreement thus far. The first observation that human activities contribute to the greenhouse effect was made one hundred years ago by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius. In the late 1950s, measurements made at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii recorded an increase in carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. Efforts to obtain international agreement on addressing human contributions to global greenhouse gases began many decades ago. In 1979, the World Meteorological Office, the United Nations Environment Programme, and the International Council for Science held the first World Climate Conference in Geneva to address the question of the potential role of human sources of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in inducing global climate changes. In 1988, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) established three scientific working groups to study the problem. The IPCC's First Assessment report in 1990, based on the findings of its three working groups, concluded that there was evidence that emissions from human sources were enhancing the greenhouse effect. In response to this report, the United Nations General Assembly launched a negotiating process to establish an agreement among industrialized nations to act to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases. In 1992, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was adopted. The nations who signed the convention agreed to develop national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions, establish national programs to reduce emissions, and mitigate climate change.
|
|
The content & opinions in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of AltEnergyMag
Comments (0)
This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.